Applyo - College Application Platform

CAT 2023 Slot 3 VARC Question & Solution

Reading ComprehensionMedium

Passage

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.

Steven Pinker’s new book, “Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters,” offers a pragmatic dose of measured optimism, presenting rationality as a fragile but achievable ideal in personal and civic life. . . . Pinker’s ambition to illuminate such a crucial topic offers the welcome prospect of a return to sanity. . . . It’s no small achievement to make formal logic, game theory, statistics and Bayesian reasoning delightful topics full of charm and relevance.

It’s also plausible to believe that a wider application of the rational tools he analyzes would improve the world in important ways. His primer on statistics and scientific uncertainty is particularly timely and should be required reading before consuming any news about the [COVID] pandemic. More broadly, he argues that less media coverage of shocking but vanishingly rare events, from shark attacks to adverse vaccine reactions, would help prevent dangerous overreactions, fatalism and the diversion of finite resources away from solvable but less-dramatic issues, like malnutrition in the developing world.

It’s a reasonable critique, and Pinker is not the first to make it. But analyzing the political economy of journalism — its funding structures, ownership concentration and increasing reliance on social media shares — would have given a fuller picture of why so much coverage is so misguided and what we might do about it.

Pinker’s main focus is the sort of conscious, sequential reasoning that can track the steps in a geometric proof or an argument in formal logic. Skill in this domain maps directly onto the navigation of many real-world problems, and Pinker shows how greater mastery of the tools of rationality can improve decision-making in medical, legal, financial and many other contexts in which we must act on uncertain and shifting information. . . .

Despite the undeniable power of the sort of rationality he describes, many of the deepest insights in the history of science, math, music and art strike their originators in moments of epiphany. From the 19th-century chemist Friedrich August Kekulé’s discovery of the structure of benzene to any of Mozart’s symphonies, much extraordinary human achievement is not a product of conscious, sequential reasoning. Even Plato’s Socrates — who anticipated many of Pinker’s points by nearly 2,500 years, showing the virtue of knowing what you do not know and examining all premises in arguments, not simply trusting speakers’ authority or charisma — attributed many of his most profound insights to dreams and visions. Conscious reasoning is helpful in sorting the wheat from the chaff, but it would be interesting to consider the hidden aquifers that make much of the grain grow in the first place.

The role of moral and ethical education in promoting rational behavior is also underexplored. Pinker recognizes that rationality “is not just a cognitive virtue but a moral one.” But this profoundly important point, one subtly explored by ancient Greek philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, doesn’t really get developed. This is a shame, since possessing the right sort of moral character is arguably a precondition for using rationality in beneficial ways.

Question 1

According to the author, for Pinker as well as the ancient Greek philosophers, rational thinking involves all of the following EXCEPT:

an awareness of underlying assumptions in an argument and gaps in one’s own knowledge
the belief that the ability to reason logically encompasses an ethical and moral dimension.
the primacy of conscious sequential reasoning as the basis for seminal human achievements.
arriving at independent conclusions irrespective of who is presenting the argument.
Solution:

Based on the discussion, the option that is NOT associated with Pinker's view of rational thinking (as well as that of the ancient Greek philosophers) is Option C - the passage suggests that while sequential reasoning is valuable, many profound human achievements come from moments of epiphany or insight rather than solely from conscious, sequential reasoning.

In relation to this thought, we are told that the emphasis on rational thought involves an understanding of the gaps in one’s own knowledge [Option A] and also ‘arriving at independent conclusions’ [Option D]: {“Even Plato’s Socrates — who anticipated many of Pinker’s points by nearly 2,500 years, showing the virtue of knowing what you do not know and examining all premises in arguments, not simply trusting speakers’ authority or charisma...”}

Towards the end of the passage, we are informed of an ethical and moral dimension [Option B] to rationality, which the author asserts that Pinker considers but does not elaborate on.

Hence, Option C is the correct choice. 

Question 2

The author endorses Pinker’s views on the importance of logical reasoning as it:

provides a moral compass for resolving important ethical dilemmas.
focuses public attention on real issues like development rather than sensational events.
equips people with the ability to tackle challenging practical problems.
helps people to gain expertise in statistics and other scientific disciplines.
Solution:

The passage emphasises Pinker's focus on sequential reasoning and the tools of rationality, suggesting that greater mastery of these tools can improve decision-making in various practical contexts where individuals must act on ‘uncertain and shifting information.’ The author’s endorsement or support for Pinker’s work is centred on the idea that logical reasoning “equips people with the ability to tackle challenging practical problems” [Option C].

Option A is incorrect - while the author acknowledges that rationality is seen by Pinker as a moral virtue, he adds that this role of moral and ethical education is underexplored in Pinker's work. Option B presents a very specific use case of Pinker’s views and fails to capture the broader message. Option D is similarly limited in scope - the emphasis is more on the broader applicability of rationality in decision-making.

Hence, Option C is the correct choice. 

Question 3

The author mentions Kekulé’s discovery of the structure of benzene and Mozart’s symphonies to illustrate the point that:

great innovations across various fields can stem from flashes of intuition and are not always propelled by logical thinking.
Pinker’s conclusions on sequential reasoning are belied by European achievements which, in the past, were more rooted in unconscious bursts of genius.
it is not just the creative arts, but also scientific fields that have benefitted from flashes of creativity.
unlike the sciences, human achievements in other fields are a mix of logical reasoning and spontaneous epiphanies.
Solution:

In the case of Kekulé, the discovery of the benzene structure reportedly came to him in a dream, showcasing how creative insights can emerge unexpectedly and unconsciously. Similarly, Mozart's symphonies, considered masterpieces of classical music, are often seen as products of his musical genius and creative intuition. Therefore, the examples support the notion that groundbreaking achievements in both scientific and artistic domains may involve moments of inspiration, intuition, or epiphany, challenging the idea that all significant accomplishments are the result of conscious and sequential reasoning. This aligns with the broader point that while conscious reasoning is valuable, there are also subconscious and intuitive processes at play in the generation of innovative ideas and creations. Option A correctly captures this idea.

Question 4

The author refers to the ancient Greek philosophers to:

show how dreams and visions have for centuries influenced subconscious behaviour and pathbreaking inventions.
indicate the various similarities between their thinking and Pinker’s conclusions.
reveal gaps in Pinker’s discussion of the importance of ethical considerations in rational behaviour.
highlight the influence of their thinking on the development of Pinker’s arguments.
Solution:

In the passage, the author notes that Pinker recognises rationality as both “a cognitive and moral virtue.” However, the author points out that this "profoundly important" connection between rationality and morality is not thoroughly developed in Pinker's book. By bringing up the ancient Greek philosophers who, according to the text, subtly explored the connection between moral character and rationality, the author is implying that Pinker's work could benefit from a more in-depth consideration of the ethical dimension of rational behaviour. Option C accurately reflects this point - none of the other choices correctly capture the intention behind mentioning the Greek philosophers.